6 Reasons Why Manual Testing Won’t Replace Automated Testing

There are so many discussions that automation testing is replacing manual testing. A lot of developers & testers in modern era want to look for the help of automation testing to make their lives simple. Test automation has received interest and much attention in recent times. But, the truth is that you can’t expect automation testing to execute all the work done by a software tester. A lot of developers and testers in the modern era prefer to seek the assistance of test automation to make their testing easy. However, test automation doesn’t have the capability to completely replace manual software testing. Therefore, we cannot expect that automation testing is stealing the job of software testers out there in the software testing world.

Reasons Why Test Automation will never replace Manual Testing:

  • It only tests what is predictable- Automated tests assure people that what we anticipate to happen does, in fact, turn out. We name this the “happy path”. Automation testing concentrates on functionality that already exists. It isn’t deep but its coverage is enormous. Test Automated is effective for regression tests, precisely when resources are restricted. But only doing test automation is sure to introduce some drawbacks and disappointment in your software testing process.
  • Automation is excessively expensive for small testing projects- Not just do you have automation testing software to pay for, but you also have high maintenance and management related costs, because of script writing & rewriting, including arrangement, set up and processing times. For big and long term projects, the higher expenses can be worth it. But for small and short projects it’s a massive waste of both money and time. When estimating the potential ROI for an automation purchase, you have to factor in additional man hours, too.
  • Automating usability tests is just impossible- Usability testing cannot be automated and it necessitates a human. You cannot train a system (laptop, computer, etc.) to spot “good” usability vs. “bad” usability. Perhaps you might think like, “Ok, we can easily skip usability testing”. Do not make such type of mistake. By skipping this type of testing, you are introducing an incredible amount of threat. This step in the Quality Assurance process is vital to ensure confidence in the product release. There is no means around involving manual testers in usability testing.
  • Automation Testing can contain faults/ bugs- Just like your app’s code can have bugs, automated tests can too. Automation tests can also catch Issues that are unaware of. If you write tests with bugs, you are literally going to have false positives, which can lead to several threats and problems for your clientele and your team. The human element of manual testing can spot these errors and ensure you are testing appropriately.
  • In agile, testing scripts have to be rewritten – Working with continuous feedback in agile environs means fluid changes to the flow of the product, the User Interface, or even attributes. And nearly every time, a modification entails a rewrite of the automated scripts for the subsequent sprint. Fresh new modifications also affect the testing scripts for regression tests, so even that classic automation example necessitates a lot of updates in agile.
  • Technical limits can come into play- The number of test scenarios is complex or downright impossible to automate. The universal argument is “automated testing is cheap”. But it’s not challenging to spend a ton of money and time on elaborate automation. For instance, testing a series of touch screen devices. How do you automate the understanding of a “swipe“and a “tap”. You cannot do that in a way that is equivalent to human being usage.

Final Verdict

The existence of both automated testing and manual testing forces us to think about our option of tools, their charge, and the rewards they will provide. There are a place and time for both testing techniques. Manual testing helps us understand the complete problem and explore other tests angles with flexibility. Test automation helps save time in the long run by achieving a large number of surface level tests in a limited time. It is up to you to decide where and when every single method of testing is used. Even though automation would not replace forms of manual testing, yet neither will manual testing remove automation. Once the distinction between them is understood, the in-depth dread of automation breaks down and a competent, gainful coordinated attempt rises.

We at ImpactQA provides both Quality Assurance manual testing as well as Automation using all the most recent automation testing and manual testing tools.

Why I talk about Context-Driven Testing?

As we know sometimes Testing Practices and Testing Techniques become very rigid and imitation based. So there must be some way by which we can easily shift our testing practices, techniques and even definition as per the circumstances or requirements. This is exactly Context-Driven Testing.

There can be different circumstances with every project we are going to deal with-

●    Requirements can be documented or not.
●    Enough time vs fighting schedules.
●    Tools Availability.
●    Clients Requirements.
●    Selection of best process for the project.
●    Trained employees’ vs untrained employees.
●    Time zone issues between the Development and Testing teams.

The Testing team working on the Context-driven testing are going to select their testing objectives, techniques, and deliverables (contains test documentation); also find out the details of the specific situation, the wishes of the stakeholders, etc.

The utmost priority of it is about doing the best with what we are having in our pocket. In Spite of applying “Principal practices and industrial testing standards”, we can accept each and every different practice or even different definition which can work best under different circumstances.

Basic principles of Context-driven testing –

●    The actual return of any practice is directly dependent on its context.
●    In context, there are good practices but not best practices.
●    How people are working together is very much important.
●    Over time, project unfolds in many ways, which are often not predictable.
●    The product is a kind of solution, if the problem doesn’t solve, the product doesn’t work.
●    Good Software testing is challenging deep thinking and intensive reasoning task.
●    Can we do the correct work at the correct time to do productive testing of our products via appropriate judgment, skill, and unified work?

Some testers may favor life-cycle models and organizational models. Let’s consider the V-model; it is a kind of disjunction between Testing group and Development group, here the testing team demand for all code along with detailed specifications. Context-driven testing has no room for this kind of philosophy. Also, agile development is related to a particular set of values that belong to only one kind of context. Context-driven testing is far broader than that. Testers get what they get, and they know how to cope with what comes their way. More importantly, a tester is basically a customer advocate. Testers should try their best to understand the customer position and make the best case when they feel it isn’t being addressed.

So the final call will be before ensuing Context-Driven testing, we should ask our self –

●    Do we value more in individuals rather than their interactions over processes or tools?
●    Do we value more in seeing working software over documentation?
●    Do we value more in responding to change over following the plan?

Expert testers can better explore how the product should work from a user’s point of view, and identify and address barriers that prevent users from fully adopting or accepting the product.

Context Driven Testing is not for every organization, and it’s not a replacement for other forms of testing.

Emerging Real Estate Technology Trends 2019

If you look back a decade of progress, Real Estate Business was merely contemplating digital opportunities and embarking on a modern path of website creation, online marketing, and mobile application development. At present Real Estate Domain in its traditional sense makes up a small part of RE Technology landscape. Real Estate Technology, also famous as PropTech, or RE Tech is projected as constant-changing and fastest-growing industry. Ever since 2012, Real Estate Tech Companies have elevated over $43 billion in funding universally. The main types of solution investors are focused on within real estate sector are Software as a service (SaaS) platforms. Companies like Zillow and Trulia are industry leaders in the real estate industry and pretty successful at offering homebuyers with the digital outline of the property, and getting them in touch with realtors and brokers who can complete the contract of deal.

Real Estate Technology Trends

Real Estate Technology is it’s an umbrella term for software platforms and tools used by diverse participants in the real estate industry, including investors, brokers, property owners, real estate-focused lenders, and managers. According to the most recent report provided by Federal Reserve in the year 2014, the real estate field has the maximum value of assets that is projected in $40 trillion. In spite of the impressive number of real estate firms, less than 10% of them have adopted the software application & software testing solutions for real estate. That means real estate tech startups with modern techniques and good products still have a great possibility to become the market leaders.

The second wave of RE technology, “2.0,” has matured over the last 6-7 years, giving boosts to two new categories, tech-enabled services and space arbitrage. The 2.0 wave in RE technology hit a milestone in July 2017 with the successful and thriving IPO of a tech-enabled real estate brokerage- Redfin. This was the first prime real estate tech-enabled services organization to go publically open and did so at a valuation multiple equivalents to pure technologies comp. The bulk of the 2.0 success stories have been businesses which found prospects to progress on the offerings of incumbents and develop at their expense. These companies usually included a technology factor though also implicated significant people-delivered or space-related services to monetize. The expansion of businesses in the space-arbitrage and tech-enabled categories demonstrates also makes it particularly challenging to delineate between traditional real estate and real estate technology. Start-ups in the newest Real estate 3.0 category, which is still in its nascent stages, where the key ‘startups’ are complementary to incumbents and have technology more centralized to their offering or may potentially focused on newest and advanced technologies and tools.

Real Estate: The Synthesis Phase:

Real estate 3.0, which is still in its nascent stages, may potentially look more like real estate 1.0 where the key ‘startups’ are complementary to incumbents and have technology more central to their offering. The themes of this newest phase will likely include:

Internet of Things technology & spatial visualization: Commercial and Home space sensors, construction planning and automation tools.

  • Google’s acquisition of Nest was a precursor to the rising excitement and investment of businesses and consumers in technology to increase their physical space. Eventually impactful for the construction & development industry will be the evolution in virtual reality tools and user intuitive spatial planning tools that could reform how people make decisions.

    RE big data: Leveraging the current gains in the ease of access of large information sets to make decisions on real estate planning and investment.

    Platforms to manage and handle services & purchase: Resources and technology that help people manage real estate transaction services and the equirements of their physical space.

  • Redfin, Zillow, WeWork, along with their segment up-and-comers, have all greatly invested to build multi-service platforms, where clients would select office and home providers though their site, leaving the opportunity for new startups.

    AI in property management and valuation: Property management is essential but can be extremely demanding, especially for agents and landlords that deal with manifold properties.

  • Intelligent homes powered by machine learning and Artificial Intelligence algorithms assists in easing off the pressure by automating jobs like screening tenants, setting the rent, alerting the important contacts at emergency, among others. New-age brokerage firms are applying deep learning capabilities to find quality properties, provide accurate real estate valuations, find underutilized properties, and assists property purchasers to determine the future value of their assets.

The cloud- Another platform with extensive impact takes on the concluding process.

  • Anybody who has ever purchased real estate knows what an inefficient, long, and frustrating procedure this is. Now, thanks to the cloud and improved data management apps, the complete procedure can be streamlined for both residential and commercial purchases — right down to electronic signs. A company that is solving this trouble in a pioneering way is PEXA (Private Exchange Australia), an online property exchange network.

Blockchain- It is the underlying technology behind cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, however, it is not merely the new payment ways that are set to modify the way we do real estate.

  • The blockchain is efficiently a decentralized database, ensuring the integrity of the data and allowing for records to be created for every single property in the nation.

Real Estate Startups have a lot on their plate when considering what trends to capitalize and what procedures will work best for their operations in order to achieve success. There are somehow several roadblocks along the way, but decision-makers in this type of industries must be smart enough to overcome challenges by using evolving technology and by staying on top of emerging trends to better meet user needs. As the technology persistently become more ubiquitous, you can expect home buying to never be the similar again.

As more people hunt for quality apps, startups should look to leverage agile testing methodologies and innovative automation testing solution offered by ImpactQA to completely vet programs & deploys the best possible products. It doesn’t matter, whether your apps are meant for consumer use or internal – your software or app must be tight and functional with no or minimal bugs. Any fixes have to be easily enacted to establish a reputation and keep user loyalty for reliability.

Core Benefits of Agile Project Management

The agile method implies an iterative and incremental method of project management and it is focused to help the tester team in maintaining focus on the fast delivery of business value. The methodologies used in the agile project follows the Agile Manifesto which is particularly based on flexibility, efforts by team members, regular improvement in product and delivery of results on time with high quality.

Earlier in software development generally referred Waterfall model method is used to develop the project which is totally different from agile method particularly because it is not iterative.

Customer satisfaction
In Agile methodology product owner always involved in the progress of development that are highly visible and flexible to change.

  • Customers also involve and engaged throughout the project.
  • Its highest priority is to satisfy the customer through the early and continuous delivery of valuable software.
  • Demonstrating working functionalities to customers in every sprint review.
  • It delivers product in market very quickly more often with every release.

Reduces risk
Using agile techniques could reduce the chance of project failure. It always had a working product, from starting off the first sprint so that no single agile project fails in upcoming future.

  • Developing in sprints ensures a short time between initial project investment and an approach will work.
  • It gives freedom when new changes require after implementation with a very little cost.

High product quality
In Agile Methodology, testing is integrated during the cycle, which means that there are continuous checkups to see the product work during the development. It also helps the product owner to make changes if needed and the working team is aware if there is an issue in the product.

  • Elaborates and defines the requirements just in time so that the knowledge of the product is as relevant as possible to all team.
  • Continuous integration and daily testing into the development process make the development team address that issue at the right time.
  • Perfect use of automation testing tools.
  • It conducts Sprint retrospectives that allow the scrum team to improve the process and work continuously.

Predictable costs and schedule
The cost of the product is predictable and limited to the amount of work that can be performed by the team in the fixed schedule time box. It is also combined with estimates provided by Client prior to each Sprint..

  • Individuals and interactions over processes and tools.
  • Working software over comprehensive documentation.
  • Customer collaboration over contract negotiation.
  • Responding to change over plan.

Focuses on users
It generally uses user stories with business-focused Acceptance Criteria which define the product features by focusing on the needs of real users, each feature incrementally delivers value. It also provides the opportunity to beta test software after each sprint.

  • All activities are focused on providing tangible business values.
  • All activities are focused on providing (business) value through ensuring a useful, usable and engaging product.
  • The customer is not defined as the project stakeholders, but the end users as well.

Bottom line
In today’s ever-changing world, organizations look for the flexible approach to delivering projects and want to become more Agile. However, for Organizations, the delivering projects and programs and where traditional project management processes still exist, the informality of the agile approach is challenging and considered too risky. A mature agile approach entails agile & Scrum training which help professionals evolve as scrum masters and improve business value.